APIIC Psychology Internship Essay

APIIC Psychology Internship EssayAPIIC Psychology Internship Essay 4 samples for APA to help get your students' mind whirring on the following point: 'To what extent can I design my own curriculum? How should I design my curriculum?' Any school that has taken the time to offer internship programs is a reputable one. If you have not taken the time to do so or are unsure about the role of internship in your curriculum, it is recommended that you start out with an APIIC internship program.One thing that a APIIC psychology internship program does not typically include is the usual question of where and how you can decide on a curriculum. In short, most internships just offer one or two classes per semester. However, remember that there is no requirement for you to teach these classes or even attend them. Interns are simply assigned as lecturers to guide their students through the material. Interns are required to be 'mentors' and to offer guidance in all aspects of the internship, rather than dictate classroom content.One example of a APIIC psychology internship program that offers students a great deal of flexibility is the Spanish program. Interns may be asked to teach a class, a group project, a small seminar, or perhaps a weekend seminar. Because each student receives the same amount of instruction, they will have a great deal of flexibility in the manner in which they learn and in which topics they want to focus on.An APIIC psychology internship program also will not tell students how many classes to take or what classes to avoid. They are also not required to assign any academic grades, so you are not trying to tell interns how to be good teachers or the quality of their work.In short, APIs are interested in interns who are interested in helping people. As such, APIIC psychology internship programs often provide internships to students who have been working as personal trainers, counselors, sales representatives, home health care workers, and other types of j obs that require you to interact with clients.APIIC psychology internship programs are also very interested in interns who have an interest in teaching. Many internships at APIs will involve an internship component, but internships are also available to students who just want to learn about teaching.The type of teaching you choose for yourself does not matter if you are accepted into a APIIC psychology internship program. As long as you know that APIIC psychology internships do not require you to provide classroom instruction, that you are not asked to teach classes, and that you do not have to be teachers, you can learn a lot by volunteering for an APIIC psychology internship.One other point to remember when considering a APIIC psychology internship is that APIs are not concerned with what your students have learned outside of the classroom. Interns are not asked to teach. What interns are asked to do is to help students to be effective communicators within their own classrooms, to guide students in meeting deadlines, and to help students develop strategies for doing well in their APA exams.

Analysis on R v MacDonald 2014 - Free Essay Example

à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“We are social beings and that we live in conditions of interdependence.[1]à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  This is the crux of legal liberalism, while legal liberalism argues for the individual this will always be constrained by our need for social interaction[2]. The case of R. v. MacDonald is based upon the issues that are faced when the police have to make a choice, protect public safety or violate an individualà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s rights. Mr. MacDonaldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s rights may have been violated but this violation of rights was consistent with the legal liberalism principal that follows those rights, they can only extend so far as to not infringe on other peopleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s rights. The case of R. v. MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3, revolves primarily around the issues surrounding the rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and how the police acted in this case. In the case at hand the defendant was having a party in his Halifax residence when some of his neighbours called in a noise complaint[3]. One officer arrived at the scene and was unable to persuade Mr. MacDonald to turn down his music so she called for another officer[4]. Upon arrival the second officer repeatedly knocked and kicked at the door until Mr. MacDonald opened it. Mr. Ma cDonald only opened the door a few inches and the offer observed what appeared to be a gun in his hand hidden behind his leg[5]. The officer then opened the door a bit more and confirmed that the metallic object was a gun, upon confirming that the officer forced himself into the apartment and disarmed Mr. MacDonald[6]. Upon further investigation it was revealed that the gun was not properly registered in Halifax and was only registered in Alberta[7]. Mr. MacDonald was charged under section 95 of the criminal code for unlawfully possessing a restricted firearm without a licence, section 86(1) carelessly handling a firearm and section 88(1) having possession of a firearm for a dangerous purpose[8]. Mr. Macdonald was convicted on all three counts and sentenced to a total of 3 years in prison[9]. The case was appealed to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal where they upheld the sentences and convictions for the charges under section 86 and 88 but threw out the conviction on section 95, this was based on the successful argument that the defendant had made a mistake of fact when he believed that his firearms licence was valid for all of Canada[10]. His sentence was also reduced on the other two charges. This was then appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada where the issue of the section 8 charter rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure was the main focus as the defendant tried to have the other two charges dismissed, the crown also appealed the findings of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal on the issue of the charge under section 95. The court reinstated the conviction under section 95 finding that although a mistake of fact was made this was no excuse and the conviction must be reinstated, but this could be a mitigating factor in sentineling[11]. On the next issue of the section 8 charter rights the court applied the Waterfeild test[12] and established that the search was justified, the police were performing there duty to protect the public and there was a real danger present and the only way to remove that danger was to perform a search, so the search was upheld and the court ruled that all of the convictions would stand[13]. Liberalism is a complex set of ideals that are the main governing ideas behind many of our modern political and legal systems today. As part of a larger political idea legal liberalism offers a perspective on how laws should be written and to what extent the government should inject itself into the day to day lives of its citizens[14]. Liberalism stresses a minimalist government approach, one of small government and few, but necessary, laws[15]. According to liberalism when laws are created they should be created in such a way to respect peopleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s individual rights, laws should not infringe on people unless it is to protect others from harm, the harm principal[16]. As a legal theory, liberalism assumes that all people are rational, independent, free thinking and completely autonomous from ou tside factors such as the community at large and the government[17]. With this in mind Devlin argues that liberalism advocates that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦society should be governed by the principals of liberty, equality and neutrality. To be more specific, Liberalism advocates that the state and law should strive to provide the citizen with as much space as possibleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ [18] Another point that goes hand in hand with the previous is the idea that each individual should be allowed to decide what their personal idea of the good is in their case[19], and each person should be free to choose his or her own path free of outside interference. While remembering that the idea of self is paramount in the realm of liberalism, it is recognized that humans do and must have social and other interactions with other people[20], in other words humans cannot operate as islands upon themselves and must be interactions with others. Legal liberalists would argue that th is is the place for law to interject, according to liberalistsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ law and government should step in to regulate these relationships and to promote the idea of positive relationships[21]. To fully realize the ideals of liberalism one must realize that this is a human created set of ideas and laws and because of that there are bound to be conflicts and tensions inherent to it. Devlin states that liberalism is the dominant legal ideal present in Canada today[22], and that the guiding principal behind that belief is one of infallible individual rights, but as Devlin goes on to point out rights are not infallible in Canada, and may be disregarded if it can be demonstrated to be justifiable in a democratic society[23]. So liberalism strives for an individualistic society, where everyone has rights that are their own, but as it can be seen there is room to bend that stringent definition of liberalism, and every society may adapt it to meet the needs of the people at the time . There are many ways in which the case of R. v. MacDonald can be looked at through the lens of liberalism. First off and probably most importantly is that of the policeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s right to search a person to ensure public safety, secondly would be the need to restrict and licence the firearm in the case and finally the question of, was Mr. MacDonald justified in pulling out a firearm when he knew or ought to have known that the police were outside of his residence? All three of these issues can be tested against the harm principal of liberalism. This principal is one that if the action is not causing harm to others than there is no reason to regulate it and there is no need for government intrusion into that area of a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s life[24]. When the policeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions are compared against this framework of the harm principal it becomes very subjective to judge whether the actions were consistent with liberalism. While all can most likely agree that a firearm is a dangerous weapon did Mr. MacDonaldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions constitute a dangerous act? This was the question that the judges had to answer and they aired on the side of caution, trusting the police officerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s judgment that this situation could have escalated into one where the public was at great risk[25]. In this same vein the judges also decided that Mr. MacDonaldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s section 8 rights could be violated if it meant ensuring public safety[26]. While this on its face would be a violation of liberalism when we consider the harm principal, this ruling and the policeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions can be considered to be within the ideals of liberalism, while one personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s rights were violated this was done to protect others, and to allow others to fully enjoy their rights without interference. On the next issue of firearms control and licencing, while the court didnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t rule on the validity of firearms li cencing they did enforce the law by upholding the conviction[27]. So this begs the question, are these controls and limitations that are put on firearms consistent with liberalism? On its face these laws would be straying into the field of government intrusion into peoplesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ private lives, but firearms can be quite dangerous so then according to the harm principal shouldnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t government attention be paid to firearms? These are the questions that must be debated when discussing the issue. Canada has decided that, to spite our legal liberalism ideals[28], that firearms are something that deserve government intrusion into peopleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s lives to ensure the protection of the public. While regulating and restricting firearms clearly goes against the ideals of legal liberalism, this is a restriction that we as a society has decided is necessary and is just in a democratic society. On the final issue of Mr. MacDonaldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions, car rying a firearm to the door of his home when he should have known that the police were outside. While this may have been a justifiable action under legal liberalism if he suspected that the persons at his door were intruders, as they would have been violating his rights[29] and therefore he could justifiably have used the weapon in self-defence but the fact was that the people at his door were police officers. They had identified themselves[30], and were in essence enforcing the rights of Mr. MacDonaldà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s neighbours, so under legal liberalism the police presence was justified as Mr. MacDonald was in the wrong[31]. When he carried his weapon he then violated everyone in the vicinityà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s right to be safe and this caused the police to act and protect all. While according to liberalism the firearms licence regime may be government intrusion, Mr. MacDonald violated his neighbours and the policeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s rights to safety and the actions that were t aken by the police were appropriate under the harm principal of legal liberalism[32]. What was a simple noise complaint turned into so much more when the defendant, Mr. MacDonald decided to bring his unregistered firearm to the door, with the police outside[33]. This turned into a charter of rights and freedoms issue at the Supreme Court of Canada where Mr. MacDonald was unsuccessful in arguing that his rights were violated[34]. When looked at through the lens of legal liberalism, it can be seen that although he may have the right to have a firearm in some contexts, in this one he was a danger to others which necessitated the policeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions against him. While the gun control system may be against the ideas of legal liberalism, the harm principal is quite clear in that you may only enjoy your rights as far as they do not harm others[35], and in this case the chance of harm was just too great to ignore. Bibliography R. v. MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3 Richard F. Devlin, Mapping Legal Theory 1994 32: 3 Alta L Rev 609. 1 [1] Richard F. Devlin, Mapping Legal Theory 1994 32: 3 Alta L Rev 610 [2] Ibid 610 [3] R. v. MacDonald, 2014 SCC 3 at para 3 [4] Ibid at para 5 [5] Ibid at para 6 [6] Ibid at para 7 [7] Ibid at para 13 [8] Ibid at para 9 [9] Ibid at para 14 [10] Ibid at para 16 [11] Ibid at para 60 [12] Ibid at para 33 [13] Ibid at para 40 [14] Devlin, supra note 1 610 [15] Ibid 610 [16] Ibid 610 [17] Ibid 610 [18] Ibid 610 [19] Ibid 610 [20] Ibid 610 [21] Ibid 610 [22] Ibid 609 [23] Ibid 611 [24] Ibid 610 [25] MacDonald, supra note 3 at para 29 [26] Ibid at para 29 [27] Ibid at para 60 [28] Devlin, supra note 1 609 [29] Ibid 610 [30] MacDonald, supra note 3 at para 5 [31] Devlin, supra note 1 610 [32] Ibid 610 [33] MacDonald, supra note 3 at para 7 [34] Ibid at para 40 [35] Devlin, supra note 1 610

The Secret to What Is a Conclusion Sentence

<h1>The Secret to What Is a Conclusion Sentence </h1> <h2>Things You Won't Like About What Is a Conclusion Sentence and Things You Will </h2> <p>The mystery is to get a theme, however not a position when you start your examination. It's imperative to create an awesome presentation. The methodology is especially helpful in case you're limited by the span of your paper. You at that point need to bring up the centrality of the investigation and point out how it is identified with the area.</p> <h2> Whispered What Is a Conclusion Sentence Secrets </h2> <p>There is a collection of similitudes, notwithstanding contrasts between the two PCs. End is the core of your whole examination with the goal that it should be convincing and provocative your crowd needs to consider it or it needs to persuade them to complete certain activities. Remember, the investigation you direct should be structured in a way it empowers you to check whether the r esults of your analysis underpins the speculation or not. It's an easy to comprehend framework which creators won't have a great deal of trouble in becoming accustomed to. </p> <h2>The Benefits of What Is a Conclusion Sentence </h2> <p>Writing an exposition end may appear to be an undeniable and easy advance in the entire article composing task. Instructions to start an end in a paper will generally rely upon the sort of article you're taking a shot at. You may find an awesome article composing organization to control you through the exposition composing process. There are a few modest altered paper composing organizations. </p> <p>To truly establish a decent connection with your peruser, you likewise need to complete it right. The whole inspiration recorded as a hard copy a guide is to change an individual's conduct, and I believe the inquiry to be among the best strategies for doing this. Additionally, you'll need a progress word to gain peruser s comprehend you will finish up. Regardless of whether it concerns the start of a Business letter or a casual letter, there are two or three things which you ought to know.</p> <p>An great intends to finish up your decision is to extend one of the key topics you've been investigating into contemporary life. The chief thought should remain unequivocally the equivalent during the full paper. Each your part is subject to other. At the very same time, you have to recall that the sort of your work (and your decision, as a result) will for the most part depend on the type of paper you're dealing with. </p> <p>Before showing up in its decision sentence, a body section should initially build the contention it's progressing. Some, in any case, have contended that non-marriage sex isn't generally that unsafe. </p> <p>Writing a closing sentence may not show up as effectively as you may might suspect. Understudies should realize how significant it's to create a finishing up sentence that is viable in summing up their point and give their last point an impact. </p> <p>An magnificent rule is to rehash your postulation articulation, on the off chance that you have one. Remember to remain behind the condition you just made. </p> <p>Many scholars don't understand that it finishes off the last contemplations about the subject on which they're composing. Verify you don't utilize the determination as an opportunity to participate in an over-summed up an unfocussed 'bluster'. Anyone perusing the end has perused the full paper, or so the end simply fills in as a guide to memory.</p> <p>You might be considering what a spiritualist or I don't feel that is valid however there's not much. The last point to watch is the best approach to make an end for a descriptive exposition. Neglecting to understand that it's used to close the keep going contemplations regarding a matter is a normal slip-up numerous authors make. </p> <p>The decision of a research project should be elegantly composed in light of the fact that as it's the last part of a paper with the goal that it ought to have an enduring impact on perusers and crowd. The most effective method to start an end for a factious exposition isn't a similar issue. You might need to enhance the significant purpose of an article or spot it in an alternate point of view for setting a greater setting. Completion an exposition with comparable situation may assist with demonstrating your point and improve an understanding.</p>

Writing A Conclusion For Research Paper Example

Writing A Conclusion For Research Paper ExampleNow, you have already developed your conclusion for research paper. It is important that the conclusion must be supported by the sources and also followed with your topic.The conclusion for research paper will describe the thesis of the paper. You should have a theme and with that, you can easily follow with the sources. Also, you can make the conclusion more exciting and more vivid if you will have some sources to support it. It will help your paper's argument to stand out from the rest.In this step, it is important that you write what you mean, what you want to say and in what you will present your research paper. A conclusion should be concise. Avoid using many words as it will make the paper sound cluttered.With the general abstract, you can already give some explanation on what you want to say. Sometimes, your abstract is the most important part because it will encourage other people to read it. Your abstract should also be clear an d brief.In the conclusion for research paper example, you will show the benefits of the thesis statement and will show what else you will show in your research paper. It should be done in a way that it will inspire other people to read it and see the benefits. It can also be used to prove your thesis.The conclusion for research paper example will describe what will happen in the second half of the paper. However, you should also include the general result that will be presented. There are two things that you should not forget to do in this section: fill in the gaps between the thesis and the conclusion for research paper example and the errors. This will also help you avoid some unpleasant moments.Finally, the conclusion for research paper example must have an end. This is because the thesis should end before the conclusion. Also, the conclusion should be written in the last paragraph so that the reader will be drawn to it. If you follow these steps, it will allow you to focus on th e task at hand and write well.